NEUROLOGICAL COMMUNITY
Comment on Dr. Alexander's recent article addressing the neurosurgical community about revelations from his NDE.
AANS Neurosurgeon : Features Volume 21, Number 2, 2012
My Experience in Coma
Eben Alexander III, MD, FACS
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. — Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
At 4:30 a.m. on Nov. 10, 2008, I suddenly became very ill with acute bacterial meningitis. Within four hours, I was deep in coma; I spent the next seven days comatose, on a ventilator. Bacterial meningitis with such a rapid decline in neurologic function conferred a 90 percent mortality rate, even at the time of my initial ER evaluation, but my prospects for survival rapidly worsened. My physicians at Lynchburg General Hospital in Virginia were shocked to find that I had acquired spontaneous E. coli meningitis, which has less than a one in 10,000,000 annual incidence (1). They were aided by experts at the University of Virginia, Duke, Massachusetts General Hospital and beyond in their efforts to find a cause and force a turnaround in what at first seemed to be an irreversible death-spiral as I failed to respond to triple antibiotics.
My medical history of recent travel to Israel (as part of my work coordinating global development of focused ultrasound surgery) raised great concern among my doctors. Around the time of my visit, physicians at The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center had reported the world’s first well-documented case of spontaneous plasmid transfer of the Klebsiella Pneumonia carbapenemase (KPC) gene from a deadly gram-negative organism into a patient’s previously uninfected intestinal E. coli, conferring total antibiotic resistance on the latter. The terrifying implications for a disastrous pandemic if such an E. coli ever escaped the strict isolation of a hospital ICU were obvious, and my doctors considered that I might represent such a case.
My neurological examinations were consistent with diffuse cortical damage plus extraocular motor dysfunction. My CT scans revealed global neocortical involvement, and, on the third day, my cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein was 1,340 mg/dl, my CSF white blood cell count 4,300 per mm3, and my CSF glucose level was down to 1 mg/dl. I was extremely ill, with diminishing chances for survival and virtually no chance for recovery. My physicians never found a cause for my mysterious malady.
Fortunately, my E. coli finally started to respond. On the seventh day of my coma, to everyone’s surprise, I opened my eyes and started to come back. I was rapidly extubated by the shocked intensivist. One of my wife’s very good friends who was there could not get over how my amazed expression looked more like an infant’s gaze, not like what one would expect from an adult returning from an unconscious state.
If one had asked me before my coma how much a patient would remember after such severe meningitis, I would have answered “nothing” and been thinking in the back of my mind that no one would recover from such an illness to the point of discussing their memories, anyway. So you can imagine my surprise at remembering an elaborate and rich odyssey from deep within coma that comprised more than 20,000 words by the time I had written it all out during the six weeks following my return from the hospital. My older son, Eben Alexander IV, who was majoring in neuroscience at the University of Delaware at the time, advised me to record everything I could remember before I read anything about near-death experiences (NDEs), physics or cosmology. I dutifully did so, in spite of an intense yearning to read everything I could about those subjects, based on the stunning character of my coma experience.
My meningitis had been so severe that my original memories from within coma did not include any recollections whatsoever from my life before coma, including language and any knowledge of humans or this universe. That “scorched earth” intensity was the setting for a profound spiritual experience that took me beyond space and time to what seemed like the origin of all existence. I am writing a book detailing that extraordinary odyssey that should be published in February 2013 by Simon & Schuster. (For updates, visit www.lifebeyonddeath.net.)
The majority of NDEs are easily differentiated from dreams and hallucinations. They represent an entirely different phenomenon. One notable characteristic is the persistence of NDE memories, compared with most memories and certainly with those of dreams or hallucinations, which tend to fade over time. NDEs tend to change people’s lives in major ways, and memories of these vivid experiences persist in detail for prolonged periods (2).
Deep in coma with severe neocortical disruption, rich experience can occur and be remembered. Conscious awareness can exist entirely independent of the brain. In fact, unfettered by the physical limitations of the human brain, consciousness is freed to much grander knowing than we humans can imagine. Only a small fraction of such awareness can come back in memories accessible by the human returned to the physical realm — and only a small fraction of that can be conveyed in a linguistic form interpretable by other humans who have not “been there.”
My coma taught me many things. First and foremost, near-death experiences, and related mystical states of awareness, reveal crucial truths about the nature of existence. And the reductive materialist (physicalist) model, on which conventional science is based, is fundamentally flawed. At its core, it intentionally ignores what I believe is the fundament of all existence — the nature of consciousness.
Psychology and psychiatry in the late 19th century were quite sophisticated in consolidating a scientific understanding of the nature of consciousness and even the possibility of its independence of the brain. Human knowledge then encountered a curiously entangled cluster of concepts — physical confirmation of the existence of atoms (via Brownian Motion), quantum mechanics and general relativity (all, of course, thanks to Albert Einstein). The ensuing scientific revolution over the next century was unprecedented in human history, and, for many, settled once and for all any discussion of the material universe as the sole basis of reality and existence.
There were dark clouds on the horizon, though, bundled with those original concepts. The enigma of the interpretation of what those experiments in quantum mechanics revealed was so profound that it drove even the likes of Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr and Erwin Schrödinger (the brilliant founding fathers of the field) away, absolutely flummoxed. From their experiments one could infer that consciousness had a definite role in creating reality. And those experimental results have only become more bizarre in recent years. (Witness the “quantum eraser” experiment performed in 2000 (3). I believe that the core of that mystery is that consciousness itself is deeply rooted in quantum processes.
Even the physicists and scientists who proselytize the materialistic model have been forced to the edge of the precipice. They must now admit to knowing just a little bit about four percent of the material universe they know exists, but must confess to being totally “in the dark” about the other 96 percent. And that doesn’t even begin to address the even grander component that is home to the “consciousness” that I believe to be the basis of it all. Given such embarrassing ignorance, it’s a bit premature for physicists to be discussing a “Theory of Everything” (TOE), tempting as that might be in our world of “publish or perish.”
That we can know things beyond the ken of the “normal” channels is incontrovertible. An excellent resource for any scientist who still seeks proof of that reality is the rigorous 800-page analysis and review of all manner of extended consciousness, “Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century” (4). This magnum opus from the Division of Perceptual Studies at the University of Virginia catalogues a wide variety of empirical phenomena that appear difficult or impossible to accommodate within the standard physicalist way of looking at things. Phenomena covered include, in particular, NDEs occurring under conditions such as deep general anesthesia and cardiac arrest that — like my coma — should prevent occurrence of any experience whatsoever, let alone the profound sorts of experiences that frequently do occur. Also noteworthy, the American Institute of Physics sponsored meetings in 2006 and 2011 covering the physical science of such extraordinary channels of knowledge (5, 6).
The neurosurgical community is in perfect position to recognize and collect the crucial reports of patients who survive journeys deep in coma from a variety of conditions. These reports will prove invaluable in further comprehending the nature of existence. But remember that patients tend not to report these unusual experiences unless specifically asked what they might remember. So ask them!
Eben Alexander III, MD, FACS, served on the faculty of Harvard Medical School for almost 15 years, achieving the rank of associate professor by 1994. He has helped promote the development of stereotactic radiosurgery, intraoperative MR imaging and MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery in neurosurgery. Dr. Alexander currently practices with a private neurosurgical group in Lynchburg, Va., and travels extensively, making presentations about revelations from his coma experience that elucidate the nature of consciousness.
References
9 Comments





I would like to commend Dr. Alexander for the courage he demonstrated in sharing details on his experience and for speaking so openly about the implications of his NDE, which run counter to commonly accepted theories on consciousness. It is important to remember that science is a process that sometimes challenges our preconceptions, rather than something static – all neatly tied up in a bow.
Report this comment
Footnote to 3rd to last paragraph:
“70 percent is ‘Dark Energy,’ that most mysterious force discovered by astronomers in the mid-1990s as they found incontrovertible proof based on Type Ia supernovas that for the last five billion years the universe has been falling up — that the expansion of all of space is accelerating. Another 26 percent is ‘Dark Matter,’ the anomalous “excess” gravity revealed over the last few decades in the rotation of galaxies and galactic clusters. Explanations will be made, but the mysteries beyond will never end.”
Report this comment
I have been following the work of a Franciscian friar, Richard Rohr, OFM. He teaches the relationship of consciousness to contemplation. I have had doubts regarding his insights. Dr. Alexander’s article is causing me to reconsider. After 40-plus years of neurosurgery (now retired) I have time to begin rearranging my thoughts, thanks to Dr. Alexander. I am looking forward to reading his book.
Report this comment
I am not surprised but very happy about the miraculous recovery of Dr Eben. We as neurosurgeons are regularly reminded of our ignorance and incompleteness of knowledge about general prognosticating factors and specifically the special realm of consciousness. My mentor, Prof. B. Ramamurthi, was critical of the neurosurgical community for not exploring the universes of consciousness and always stated that neurosurgeons are most likely to get this grail if they try. I thank Dr. Eben for sharing his experience. I believe there is matter, energy, dark matter, dark energy, multiple dimentions and lots more that will be discovered, and consciousness may be a more general quality than we assume. Neurosurgeons may find James Gleick’s Chaos and Steven Strogatz’s Sync intresting.
Report this comment
I concur with Mr. Ireland’s comment in regards to your courage and candor with which you are sharing your experience as well as the ongoing process of resetting previous belief systems and perceived knowledge.
I can’t help, but wonder why it is that you haven’t come across Dr. Stuart Hameroff’s research yet (or have you? Your referenced sources don’t list them so far, as far as I can tell). Dr. Hameroff has had a successful career as an anesthesiologist at the University of Arizona and has devoted his time to coming back to his original interest of exploring the nature – or rather: emergence – of consciousness in human beings (or other mammals or in general). To my knowledge, his interest was particularly refuelled by coming across Roger Penrose’s book “The Emperor’s New Mind” (http://goo.gl/imXai) and Hameroff and Penrose started to collaborate in an interdisciplinary manner. They have since formulated a theory of collapse of the wave function via orchestrated reduction (orchestrated OR) that leads to the subjective experience of awareness, mediated via microtubules in the brian’s cytoskeleton (Hameroff). Their point being – and thus being in opposition with mainstream positions held by the scientific community – that consciousness is NOT an emergent property of complex brains (and thus of complex structures of “thinking matter”). Even prior to finding your experience, story and soon-to-be-released book, I found their ideas very compelling and – to whatever extent I am able to say – very plausible.
Anyway… maybe something you might consider looking into at your convenience.
Kind regards,
Werner Nieke
Report this comment
… minor correction: Orchestrated _objective_ reduction…
Report this comment
I posted this elsewhere, but thought it would be useful in this forum. NY neurosurgeons wishing to comment would be welcome … I am a PhD neuropharmacologist with emphasis in Functional Brain Imaging trained at Cornell in the reductionist processes that a scientist usually is. I point to the work of Sir John Eccles, Noble Laureate, who described the correlation between mental processes and neural activity — in other words, when you do anything or think anything or move your arm, for instance, what happens in the brain prior to that. Yes, there is activity in the premotor cortex and motor cortex, which initiates the movement. But what happens prior to that? Electrical activity cannot be spontaneous; the question is, what gives rise to this in the first place? If one attempts to go back to the first initiating cortical activity that started the chain, one could locate this probably to the nanosecond and region, but the question would still arise, what was the initiating event of the electrical activity? John Eccles described mental phenomenon preceding electrical activity in the brain; he became a dualist at the end and realized that activity in the brain arising out of nothing was not possible; the tenets of cause and effect require a genesis of activity, and that likely serves as the bridge between our free will and action. He further described elements, which today are mentioned in the literature as quantum mechanics, that serve to link nontangible and tangible aspects of neural activity. I personally believe that mental phenomenon cannot be specifically centered in the constraints of time/space in the physical brain, and there is something else which links this together. This corresponds with memory, as well. Consider the cloud computing phenomenon where you can store large amounts of data remote from your computer and have it recalled by your computer. This is likely very similar to some form of field where by memory is stored and can be recalled in the brain. Regardless, this is a fascinating area and has led me to not believe in a purely reductionist hypothesis. Something is going on, and for skeptics to outright deny is wrong.
Report this comment
Muy interesante el articulo, espero con mucho interes el libro a publicar por el Doctor.
Report this comment
I and many other Christians – I am a Catholic – have had experiences during prayer (for lack of a more specific term, though one might also call it a deep questioning, or in some cases an appeal for help and reassurance) which seem to open the mind to an awareness or knowing of what one may call “transcendence.” The impression is that this phenomenon, domain, or whatever one wishes to call it, is always there, but that we most often censor or turn away from it.
One feels that this knowing must be spontaneous, often initiated by an urgent need, and as devoid as humanly possible of any selfish or exploitative motive. The one who perceives, or is given perception, should be, at least at the moment, childlike in innocence, smallness, humility, dependence. A term in Christian tradition is the Greek term kenosis – emptying of the self.
It cannot be subject to scientific study for reasons that should be obvious, nor is it possible to imagine a scientific protocol which would enable investigators to generate a mathematically verifiable prediction from a hypothesis concerning this happening.
And yet, it is.
Best wishes,
Pavel